Używamy plików cookies, aby zapewnić najlepsze doświadczenia na naszej stronie. · Polityka prywatności
The digital workflow is not a trend – it's a standard that increases precision, shortens time, and eliminates analog errors. Get to know the tools and processes we use at deltalabs.
Practices that have switched to a digital workflow report fewer adjustments, shorter appointments, and higher patient satisfaction. But technology only works when correctly implemented.
Intraoral scanner or impression material? A comparison of precision, comfort, and impact on the final prosthetic outcome.
A scanner is a precise tool – but precision depends on the operator. What are the most common errors we see?
3D printing in a prosthetic laboratory is not a gadget – it's a production tool. What exactly do we print and why?
While traditional silicone impressions have worked excellently for decades, intraoral digital scanning is changing the reality of collaboration between clinic and lab. This is not 'something cool to try' — it's an operational shift that speeds up work by several days and eliminates errors resulting from material deformation.
Intraoral scanners have transformed lab work: faster, more precise, no model transport. But not in every case. Almost every clinician who has worked with a scanner for several years knows situations where they consciously revert to silicone impressions — not due to a lack of scanning skills, but because the impression delivers a better outcome in that specific case.
One of the most common reasons for complaints about prosthetic work is the discrepancy between the clinician's expectations and the final product. The error doesn't lie in the material or the milling machine — it lies in the fact that the design wasn't approved before production. At deltalabs., the CAD design is always sent to the clinician for approval before machining begins.
3D printing isn't a single process. It's a set of technologies, each with a different purpose and level of accuracy. A lab doesn't print everything — it prints what makes specific technical and economic sense.
Two model production technologies. Both digital. Both accurate. But each has a different application profile, different economics, and different limitations. In a digital laboratory, the choice between them is a matter of business logic — not ideology.
AI in prosthodontics isn't about robots designing bridges or algorithms replacing experienced technicians. It's about specific tools supporting specific stages — and when used wisely, they genuinely accelerate work and reduce errors. Below is a practical overview: what works, what doesn't, and where it's hardest to separate marketing from reality.
For decades, edentulous prosthodontics relied on the same algorithm: impressions, stone models, wax try-in, polymerization. Today, this algorithm has an alternative. A digital workflow for complete dentures shortens working time, reduces the number of appointments, and allows for denture reproduction from an archive — without starting from scratch.
A physical articulator costs PLN 5-20k, takes up space on the lab bench, and requires precise mounting of models. In a digital workflow, it's optional. CAD software includes a virtual articulator model, simulating mandibular movements without physical models or device mounting.
DSD (Digital Smile Design) is a methodology for designing prosthetic aesthetics based on facial proportion analysis. In a digital workflow, instead of drawing sketches, we import patient photos into software and design the smile in the context of the face, not in isolation. The result: the dentist and patient see the aesthetic proposal before any tissue is prepared.
Before the digital workflow, the only option to discuss a complex case was by phone or an in-person visit to the lab. Now, the dentist can view a virtual design of the restoration in full 3D detail on their computer screen, in real-time, together with the CAD technician — without leaving the office. Result: instead of 2-3 days of email exchanges, you have an approved design after 30 minutes.
The paper lab prescription has remained largely unchanged for decades: a form filled out in the dental office, sometimes pre-printed, sent with the case to the lab, and manually entered into the system by a technician. Each of these steps is a point where information can be distorted, lost, or misinterpreted. An electronic lab prescription eliminates most of these risk points.
Standard aesthetic planning has relied on two-dimensional face photos — frontal, profile, smile — for over a decade. This is sufficient in most cases. However, for full-arch reconstructions, changes in vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO), surgical planning, or patients with significant asymmetry, 2D photography has limitations. 3D face scanning captures the complete geometry of the facial surface.
Digital workflow doesn't always mean faster. It means fast in a different way. In some stages — scanning, CAD design, milling — it offers a lead of several days. In others — traditional methods would be just as efficient, or sometimes faster. Transparency about where you gain and where you don't is the foundation of trust between the dental office and the lab.
Digitalization in prosthetics represents real progress — faster, more precise, more repeatable. But technology has its physical and economic limitations. A laboratory that understands these limits and can communicate them directly gains more trust than one that sells digitalization as a panacea for every problem.
deltalabs. is a fully digital laboratory. Every order goes through a digital pipeline – from scan import, through CAD, to quality control before shipping.
CONTACT USGet in touch — we'll discuss your case and find the optimal solution.
3SHAPE · ITERO · MEDIT · DENTSPLY SIRONA