Używamy plików cookies, aby zapewnić najlepsze doświadczenia na naszej stronie. · Polityka prywatności
Fiber in prosthetics solves a specific problem: you need metal-free reinforcement. But — and this is crucial — fiber reinforcement is never an alternative to zirconia or metal. It's a solution for specific clinical situations. At deltalabs., we see it daily: clinicians order fiber-reinforced composite bridges, either to save money or because the patient 'doesn't want metal' — and then they're surprised when the bridge breaks in its second year. The problem? Misunderstood intention.
Fiber in prosthetics solves a specific problem: you need metal-free reinforcement. But — and this is crucial — fiber reinforcement is never an alternative to zirconia or metal. It's a solution for specific clinical situations. At deltalabs., we see it daily: clinicians order fiber-reinforced composite bridges, either to save money or because the patient "doesn't want metal" — and then they're surprised when the bridge breaks in its second year. The problem? Misunderstood intention.
Fiber reinforcement is a layer of fibers (glass, kevlar, polyester) embedded in a composite matrix. The role of the fiber is to interrupt crack propagation. The fiber acts as a "brake" for the network of microdamages within the material.
In laboratory practice, this means:
But: fiber does not change the fundamental character of the material. If you have a fiber-reinforced bridge with insufficient wall thickness or improper proportions, fractures will still occur — just a bit later.
Glass prepreg (ready-to-use, resin-impregnated) — everStick, SPLINT-IT, Fiber-Reinforced Resin — is the most common solution.
Practical application:
Conditions: where glass fiber works best:
Problem with glass fiber:
A thin, flexible polyethylene ribbon, adhesively adapted to the lingual surface.
Practical indication:
A quiet but important role. Mesh embedded in the first layer of composite:
Fiber: always a good solution:
Fiber: does not make sense (choose zirconia or metal):
Data from the literature clearly show:
| Scenario | Strength | Clinical Survival Time |
|---|---|---|
| Fiber-reinforced composite bridge, non-bruxing patient | 600–800 N (in laboratory) | 3–5 years (good) |
| Fiber-reinforced composite bridge, bruxing patient | 400–600 N (dramatically less) | 1–2 years (fractures) |
| Ribbond splint, periodontics | 200–300 N (not meant for heavy load) | 6–12 months (temporary) |
| Monolithic zirconia, bruxing patient | 900–1200 N | 8–12 years |
What does this mean in practice?
Fiber is a temporary or auxiliary solution. If a patient says "I don't want permanent metal," you respond: "Okay, fiber for 3–4 years, then zirconia." Not: "Fiber will last forever."
LABORATORY PERSPECTIVE
Contact deltalabs. — we will advise you on the best solution for your case.
Get in touch — we'll discuss your case and find the optimal solution.
3SHAPE · ITERO · MEDIT · DENTSPLY SIRONA