Używamy plików cookies, aby zapewnić najlepsze doświadczenia na naszej stronie. · Polityka prywatności
The patient presents with a posterior crossbite. You send the model to the lab—but fail to mention that this is the patient's normal, which you want to reproduce. The lab technician looks at the model, sees the crossbite, and thinks: 'Scanning or preparation error—I'll fix it.' The restoration arrives at your office. The patient sits, chews—and says you've changed their bite.
The patient presents with a posterior crossbite. You send the model to the lab—but fail to mention that this is the patient's normal, which you want to reproduce. The lab technician looks at the model, sees the crossbite, and thinks: "Scanning or preparation error—I'll fix it." The restoration arrives at your office. The patient sits, chews—and says: "You've changed my bite; now my TMJs hurt." The lab wanted to help. But without information in the prescription, they worked based on assumption. This is a communication problem, not a technical one. And it can be entirely avoided—with one sentence in the prescription.
A model is static. A patient lives dynamically. A model shows:
A model does not show:
A lab technician looking at a model in isolation faces the question: "Is this normal for this patient, or an error I need to correct?" Without an answer—they guess. And when they guess wrong, the patient sits in the chair feeling pain.
| Type of Relationship | Description | Extent of Problem | Lab Needs to Know |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anterior crossbite | Upper incisors occlude palatally BEHIND lower incisors (instead of in front). | Usually 1–4 anterior teeth. | Is this patient's anatomy or a preparation error? To reproduce or correct? |
| Posterior crossbite | Upper posterior teeth occlude LINGUALLY (internally) behind lower posterior teeth. | One or both sides, ranging from premolar to last molar. | Which side, which teeth, whether functional or structural, whether to reproduce. |
| Deep bite / overbite | Upper incisors overlap lower incisors >3–4 mm vertically. | Affects the entire anterior segment. | Increase / maintain / decrease? What are the patient's anatomical limits? |
| Unilateral Cusp-Fossa Relationship (Lack of Unilateral Support) | Patient primarily chews on one side—the other side is non-functional. | One side affected, the other side normal. | Which side is functional? What occlusal scheme to apply? Should chewing habits be changed? |
| Asymmetrical midline | Maxillary midline ≠ Mandibular midline (shift >2 mm). | Patient's entire perception (aesthetics) and occlusion. | Anatomical or error? Reproduce or correct to symmetry? |
"Right posterior crossbite"—is this the patient's natural anatomy, or the result of poor preparation, bad scanning, or incorrect implant position? If the lab doesn't know, they might think it's an error—and try to "fix" it. The patient, for whom this was a natural state of function, suddenly feels a change and discomfort.
Information for the lab: "Right posterior crossbite—anatomical, patient accustomed for years, no reported problems. Please reproduce."
A patient who has been chewing with a deep bite for 20 years has developed accustomed muscles, TMJs, and habits. Changing the relationship means discomfort and risk of TMJ inflammation.
Information: "Deep bite—patient functions without problems. No change in occlusal vertical dimension planned. Please reproduce."
Do they want correction (if they feel discomfort) or reproduction of the existing state (because they are accustomed to it)?
Scenario A: "Crossbite—patient reports TMJ pain. We plan staged correction. For articulator work—consult before fabrication." Scenario B: "Crossbite—patient chews normally, no complaints. Please reproduce existing relationships."
In every lab prescription, when relationships are atypical, include:
LABORATORY PERSPECTIVE
Contact deltalabs. — we will advise on the best solution for your case.
Get in touch — we'll discuss your case and find the optimal solution.
3SHAPE · ITERO · MEDIT · DENTSPLY SIRONA